Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Anderson v. Lockett et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. Lockett, Sgt. Lamar and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Holland et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lamar Hall
Defendant:
CO I Holland, CO I Fleming and M. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Alex Moses, Lt. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Lewis Hullet, Sgt. Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Lewis Hulett, Sgt. Cross and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00876
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, John Peasant and N. Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deramus v. Johnson et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00506
Plaintiff:
Bobby James Deramus
Defendant:
Herbie Johnson, Larry Nixon, Sgt. Villa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Farr v. Riley et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lon Lamar Farr
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King and Alabama Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pinkard v. Melton et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2007cv00735
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Pinkard, Sr.
Defendant:
Adam Melton, Donald Truitt and Benard Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00266
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Officer Barnes, Captain Barrett, Linda Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
