Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Hicks et al v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
John Hicks, John Hicks, John Hicks and others
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Richard Allen and Bob Riley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dickey v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Dickey
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Alabama Department of Corrections, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alverson v. Cummins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
John Cummins, Louis Boyd, Bob Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grundy v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Grundy
Defendant:
Richard Allen, David Wise, Dr. Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Esco v. Steel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Billy Dwight Esco
Defendant:
Lt. Steel, Leeposey Daniels, AL Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Giles v. Jones et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Giles
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Richard Allen, Dr. Siddiq and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrington v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Arrington
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, C. Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00945
Plaintiff:
Robert Junior Robinson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen, Levan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cameron v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00819
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Frank Cameron
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Sutton et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00745
Plaintiff:
Felicia Dixon
Defendant:
James Sutton, Correctional Medical Services, X Y & Z Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
