Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Holland v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00648
Plaintiff:
James Edward Holland
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Larry McCovery and Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. King et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
James Edward White
Defendant:
Brenda King, Jefferson S. Dunn and Robert Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Bryant (INMATE 2)(JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
James Edward Wallace
Defendant:
Phil Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Edward White
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn and Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Edward White
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Eagle et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00448
Plaintiff:
James Edward Wallace
Defendant:
Chen Xiongying Eagle, Sander Viak and Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
James Edward Patterson
Defendant:
Elmore Correctional Facility, Draper Correctional Facility, Bruce Lafogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brand v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
James Edward Brand
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers and Shawn Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
