Cases 91 - 100 of 449
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Department of Corrections (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jhamal D. Crawford
Defendant:
Donald Trump and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Newsome et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00375
Defendant:
Mary Craig, William Dillard, Jeanine Hineman and others
Plaintiff:
McArthur Lynch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flagg v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00309
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Steven T. Marshall and Larry K. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McQueen v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00389
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. McQueen
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Department of Corrections and Fountain Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00374
Defendant:
T. Boyd, Officer Carter and Christopher Moore
Plaintiff:
Travone D. Williams and Travone Deshaun Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sean Washington and Sean D. Washington
Defendant:
James Brazier, Officer Peterson, Kelita Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
