Cases 111 - 120 of 8,754
Williams v. Fulghum et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Megan Fulghum and Mrs. Ousley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Demetra L. Corcino, Officer Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villafana v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Villafana
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Nicki M. McFerrin, Justin Louvorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Storey v. Cunningham (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Melvin Storey
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Mayes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mardedues L Mack
Defendant:
E. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Jones (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
