Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Giles v. Simpson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Joy Simpson, John H. Merrill, Yvonne Trafford and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threats v. Helms et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00438
Plaintiff:
Damon L. Threats
Defendant:
James Brannon, Tony Helms and Commander Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veteto v. Clerks, Judges and Justices of Alabama Courts et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Veteto
Defendant:
Clerks, Judges and Justices of Alabama Courts, Gregory O. Griffin, Lyn Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ellington et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Andre Deon Jones
Defendant:
Edward Ellington, T. Myrick, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Tony Helms, Jasmine Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Helms et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Tony Helms , Commander Dillon and James Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kelly
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Billups et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Bruce Eric Hall
Defendant:
Phyllis Billups , Susan Kennedy , John Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Abraham Kelly
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Mark Bruton and Cassandra Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
