Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council and Kinetik Justice
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, John Hamm, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holifield v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Holifield
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Fernetta Riley, Lt. Gartland, Charles Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpers v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Bumpers
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dailey v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Mr. Ellis, Camille Luckie, Pamela Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Malon Jermaine Dailey and Marlon Jermaine Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, CRPN Aplinlin, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Arnaldo Mercado, Mary Cooks, Christy Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keith Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Topping et al v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00941
Defendant:
Mary Cooks, Cheryl Price, Ms. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman and Joseph Scott Topping
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortenbury v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01004
Defendant:
John Crow, Cheryl Price, Reosha Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeWayne Fortenbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Wellington Emanuel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
