Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Weingrad v. Keyes (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ari P. Weingrad
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zito v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Zito
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dwight R. Coleman, Robert Earl Jackson Little, Jason Daniels and others
Defendant:
Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.P.C. v. Raybon et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00203
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Steven T. Marshall and Terry Raybon
Plaintiff:
C. P. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dees v. Myles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01072
Defendant:
Warden Myles, Lt. Waverly, P. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dees and Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00991
Defendant:
Deidra Wright, Alabama Department of Corrections, Wendy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadsworth v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00665
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Plaintiff:
Samuel P. Wadsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
