Cases 91 - 100 of 295
Gann v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Mrs Truss and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00313
Defendant:
Captain Smite, Jimmy Thomas, Cpt. Hutton and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Warden Myers, Lt. Jones, Officer Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Sayon Lenard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Facion v. Massey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00165
Defendant:
N. Lawson, Jasmyn T. Massey and Captain Danzey
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lashep Facion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Captain Dansby, Officer Lampkin, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
