Cases 101 - 110 of 1,867
Southard v. Bridges et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Southard, II
Defendant:
D. Bridges and J. Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southard v. Dodson et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Southard, II
Defendant:
J. Dodson and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Montgomery County, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Alabama and Montgomery County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metz v. Dodson et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
George D. Metz, II
Defendant:
J. Dodson and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Sara Foster, Juliette Morgan Hampton Memorial Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
In re Amie Adelia Vague, et al (Panel: Judge Watkins, Judge Proctor, Judge Beaverstock)
as 2:2022mc03977
In Re:
Amie Adelia Vague, Jeffrey P. Doss, Melody H. Eagan and others
Flagg v. Caine et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Andrea Duhreal Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
Roy Caine, E. Isler, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flagg v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Andrea Duhreal Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
W.G. Jones, James Watson, Randall Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In the Matter of the Appointment of Sandra J. Stewart as United States Attorney
as 2:2022mc03974
In Re:
In the Matter of the Appointment of Sandra J. Stewart as United States Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
