Cases 131 - 140 of 22,025
Smith v. Ivey (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc. and Host Katisha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Alabama Department of Human Resources Food Stamp Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Marenzo Marquis Roberts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Murray v. Southern Springs 401(k) Retirement Plan et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Naziree Murray
Defendant:
Southern Springs 401(k) Retirement Plan and Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crawford v. Ladnier et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Martin Crawford
Defendant:
Darrell Ladnier, Shelton Hamilton, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Murphy v. Officer Kopps(Inmate 1)
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeal v. Exeter Finance LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stefone McNeal
Defendant:
Exeter Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
