Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Harris v. TOPCO Associates, LLC
as 2:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Georgia Ann Harris
Defendant:
TOPCO Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Chilton County System et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Davis (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00847
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leo Bailey, Sr.
Defendant:
Ann Davis and Chilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00759
Plaintiff:
Christopher Norris Simmons
Defendant:
Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and Chilton County Jail Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon et al v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
James Moon and Jennifer Anne Moon Jones
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Dana Berry, Emily Culver, Lisa Shehee and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Brown v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Lillie Ann Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
