Cases 201 - 210 of 22,025
Poser Investments, Inc. v. Sharma et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Poser Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Chiranji Sharma and Geea Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Amanda G. Lee, Brittany Lee and Barbara G. Hadaway
Defendant:
Billy H. Chapman and USAA Casualty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort Claim
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Dynamic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc.
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neff v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Anthony Neff
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Markel Carr
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kumar v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anshul Kumar
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
