Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Jarrell v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
George Edward Jarrell
Defendant:
Tom Davis, Shane Hamilton and Tyler Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2015cv00812
Plaintiff:
Janelle Hamilton
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huff et al v. Vilsack
as 2:2015cv00700
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Plaintiff:
John T. Huff, Jr. , Huff Management Co., Inc. , Alex City Parkway Apartments, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Brown v. Lutti et al (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thacker et al v. Eppler et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 3:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jodi Thacker and Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
Richard Wayne Eppler and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Pivnichny, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Franklin-El v. Griffin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Marvin Franklin-El
Defendant:
Gregory O. Griffin, Meredith Hamilton Barnes, Dana Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posey v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00943
Plaintiff:
Clark L. Posey, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Frank Albright, Victor L. Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
Shandalynn Hamilton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00281
Plaintiff:
David D. Hamilton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Cassandra Conway and Dewayne Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
