Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. U-Haul International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Kelley
Defendant:
U-Haul International, Inc. , Sovran Holdings, Inc., Eberly Transportation and others
Cross_claimant:
Katherine Miller
Cross_defendant:
Eberly Transportation, Sovran Holdings, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00750
Plaintiff:
Nathan Kelley
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belk v. Thompson et al
as 2:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Kelley G. Belk, III
Defendant:
Thomas L. Thompson and Linda Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kelley v. Tallapoosa Co. Jail (INMATE2)
as 3:2010cv00266
Plaintiff:
Phillip Randolph Kelley
Defendant:
Tallapoosa Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Massey v. Shell et al
as 2:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
Minnie Massey
Defendant:
Edna Shell, Eugene Shell, Al Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Kelley v. Steel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Kelley
Defendant:
Lt. Steel, Richard Allen, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelley et al v. Lewis Trucking Company et al
as 2:2008cv00992
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Kelley, Carolyn Kelley, M. K. and others
Defendant:
Lewis Trucking Company, Andrew Carter, Jr., Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
