Cases 21 - 30 of 1,429
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Michael Javon Daniel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Focia v. United States of America (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert Focia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baker et al v. Scott Farm Supply, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Marty Baker, Michael Childs, Creed Orick and others
Defendant:
Mack W. Scott and Scott Farm Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Johnson v. West (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holley v. Dozier (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Morris B. Holley
Defendant:
Michael Dozier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grams v. Treis Blockchain, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Mark Grams
Defendant:
Treis Blockchain, LLC, Chain Enterprises, LLC, Cevon Technologies, LLC and others
Griffin v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael Griffin
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
