Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Nix v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00818
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Nix
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Nathaniel Lawson, Gwendolyn Babers, S. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
National Loan Acquisitions Company v. Splash Car Wash, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
National Loan Acquisitions Company and National Loan Acquisitions Company
Defendant:
Splash Car Wash, Inc., Joseph E. Wade, Michael G. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Owners Insurance Company v. H. W. Wade & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00343
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company and Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
H. W. Wade & Company, Inc., Charles M. Freeman, III and Cynthia Freeman
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rhodes v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department(MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Rhodes
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zorn et al v. Integon Insurance Company et al MAG+
as 1:2007cv01048
Defendant:
Robert Ignasiak, Integon Insurance Company, Scott. M.W. Haufe and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Zorn and Vonnie Zorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphree v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00832
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wade Murphree
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
