Cases 31 - 40 of 22,089
Sewell v. Maddox et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Amy Giles Sewell
Defendant:
Thomas N Maddox, City of Elba, Alabama and Harold L. Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Williams v. Lawson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams
Defendant:
Angela Lawson, Megan Fulghum, Valicia White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Tyler W. Norman, Sgt. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Openly LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jay Hudson
Defendant:
Openly LLC and Rock Ridge Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. v. Hamilton
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. doing business as Simplot Grower Solutions
Defendant:
Oscar L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson et al v. Pirtle (CONSENT)
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson and J. R.
Defendant:
Lisa Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Marley (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Josh Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
