Cases 31 - 40 of 22,025
Read Freely Alabama et al v. Autauga-Prattville Public Library Board of Trustees
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Read Freely Alabama, Alabama Library Assocation, Samantha Diamond and others
Defendant:
Autauga-Prattville Public Library Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Will Ainsworth, House Speaker Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. Mackey et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Cherryl Oliver
Defendant:
Eric Mackey and James Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slade v. Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Marshall Slade
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Cody Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shuford v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Brandon Denard Shuford
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
