Cases 41 - 50 of 22,025
Shuford v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Brandon Denard Shuford
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dennard v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Virgil Dennard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trejo v. Fair et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Alberto Trejo
Defendant:
K. Fair and Arnaldo Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buggs v. Leslie et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
Donna Leslie, Montgomery Area Mental Health Authority and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Javaughn Edwards
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crawford v. Ladnier et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Martin Crawford
Defendant:
Darrell Ladnier, Shelton Hamilton, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Bob Riley, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLain v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Leah Y McLain
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
