Cases 51 - 60 of 1,867
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Circle K Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Circle K Inc., Alimentation Couche-Tard, Brian Hannasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Circle K Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc., Alimentation Couche-Tard, Brian Hannasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Thomas
Defendant:
Capt. Thomas, Captain Jenkins and Lt. Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bifield v. Kimberly et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eugene Bifield
Defendant:
Melissa Kimberly, Victor Moreno, C. Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00357
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
