Cases 61 - 70 of 1,142
Williams v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Stacy Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Brian Thompkins, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Brian Thompkins, David Lamar, Mr. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbitt v. Henry County Commissioners
as 2:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gary Corbitt
Defendant:
Henry County Commissioners, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Maddox William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Williams v. Dollar General Corporation
as 2:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Linda Williams
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Duncan v. Streeter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Duncan
Defendant:
William Streeter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchum v. Blankenship et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
William Lee Mitchum
Defendant:
Christopher M. Blankenship and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
