Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Haigler v. City of Montgomery, AL et al
as 2:2010cv01008
Plaintiff:
Antonio Haigler
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, AL, Montgomery Police Department, Todd Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Betty Morris
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Arrington v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Arrington
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, David Wise, Lieutenant Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. King et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
Troy King, Alan Nummy, Thomas Coram, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Pea River Electrical Cooperative et al
as 1:2009cv01177
Plaintiff:
Gayle Morris and Gayle Morris
Defendant:
Pea River Electrical Cooperative, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Pea River Electric Co-Op Group Health Care Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Morris v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01147
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morris v. Coram (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv01126
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
Thomas Coram, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Coram (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01107
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
Thomas Coram, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Coram et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01085
Plaintiff:
George Hoey Morris
Defendant:
Thomas Coram, Jr. and Margaret Faulkner
Cause Of Action: O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
