Cases 81 - 90 of 194
Robinson v. Elliott, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00825
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Tyler Elliott, Jonathan Godwin and Timothy Trayham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant:
Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force, Jimmy Abbett, E. Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ball v. McCollough et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
R. McCollough , Steward Bradford , Social Worker Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Neauthor Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00459
Plaintiff:
Willie F. Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murdock v. Montgomery County Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Murdock, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Alabama , Derrick Cunningham , Wanda Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company v. City of Alexander City et al
as 3:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Alexander City and Willie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Robinson v. American General Life Insurance Company (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00354
Plaintiff:
Taneshia Robinson
Defendant:
American General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Latrenda Kay Robinson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
