Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sherman v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Sherman
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Shearon et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
CO Tucker, CO Sherman, Sgt. Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherman v. Saul (CONSENT)
as 1:2019cv01036
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tommie Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. State of Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , Sherman Norfleet , Clarence Muhammad and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama and John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Broadhead v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sherman Antwan Broadhead
Defendant:
Kendrick Boyd, Paul Sanders, Michael T. Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 2:2015cv00791
Plaintiff:
Kelley Sherman and Brandon Collins
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Ratcliffe (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Sherman Antwan Broadhead
Defendant:
Quenten D. Ratcliffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
