Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miles v. Cummings et al
as 2:2020cv00242
Plaintiff:
Alexis Miles
Defendant:
City of Union Springs, Alabama and Shane Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charest v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cummings
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cummings v. Jones, et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Hubert Calvin Cummings
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cummings v. Jones, et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Hubert Calvin Cummings
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner et al (INMATE 1) (MEMBER)
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hayes
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner, John Cummings and Sgt. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Cummings et al
as 2:2010cv00583
Plaintiff:
Shirley Faye Miller
Defendant:
John Cummings , Freddie Butler , Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
