Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Flournoy v. Harris et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00286
Plaintiff:
Donnell Flournoy
Defendant:
I. Harris, Kim Tobias Thomas, Warden Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrithers v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
John Richard Carrithers
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Gary Hetzel, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Canty et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00892
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Edward Broadhead
Defendant:
Steven Canty, Stephanie Govan and Deputy Warden Sconyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
Christopher Atkinson
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Deputy Warden Sconyers, Tyrone Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanon v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00660
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Brian Thompkins, Lt. Woods, Captain Barbers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Jones et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Giles
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Richard Allen, Dr. Siddiq and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cameron v. Daniels et al(INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00916
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Frank Cameron
Defendant:
Warden Daniels, D. Williams, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Egbuonu v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00685
Plaintiff:
Zephyrinus Egbuonu
Defendant:
Kitchen Steward William , Kitchen Steward Vance , Lieutenant Cash and others
Cause Of Action: O
Smith v. Hulett et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Sheraton Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Hulett and Deputy Warden Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
