Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Enchanted Green LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Enchanted Green LLC
Defendant:
Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission, William Saliski, Jr., Sam Blakemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddle v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00783
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Mr. Deason, Charles McKee and others
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2019cv00425
Plaintiff:
Mario Dion Woodward
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson et al v. State of Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00783
Plaintiff:
Treva Thompson , Melissa Swetnam , Antwoine Giles and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , John H. Merrill , George Noblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Gadson v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Chedrick Dion Gadson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gadson v. Lockett (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Chedrick Dion Gadson
Defendant:
Charles L. Lockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Neal v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Dion Mario Neal
Defendant:
Lt. Calloway, Officer Wilson, Officer Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammell v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Demetruis Dion Trammell
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milton v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv01252
Plaintiff:
Michael Dion Milton
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers v. Myers, et al. (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2014cv01029
Plaintiff:
Robin Dion Myers
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Walter Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
