Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Neely v. Elmore County et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Neely
Defendant:
Elmore County, Elmore County Commission, Henry Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perkins et al v. Merion Realty Services, LLC et al (Joint Assign)(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
Kevin Perkins , Brittney Perkins , Latoya Lewis and others
Defendant:
Merion Realty Services, LLC , Merion Realty Management, LLC , Robert M. Bob Dominy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. Merion Realty Management, LLC, et al.
as 2:2013cv00919
Plaintiff:
Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Merion Realty Management, LLC, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Bayview Asset Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Hard-ing Builders, LLC et al v. The City of Phenix City, Alabama
as 3:2007cv01069
Plaintiff:
Hard-ing Builders, LLC, Hard-ing Builders, LLC, Vision Quality Homebuilders, LLC and others
Defendant:
The City of Phenix City, Alabama, The City of Phenix City, Alabama and The City of Phenix City, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daugherty v. Reliance Standard Insurance
as 3:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
Carol Daugherty
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Insurance and Reliance Standard Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Daugherty v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Daugherty
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Sgt. Brown, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
