Cases 1 - 10 of 145
McQueen v. Flowers (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tenika McQueen
Defendant:
Felicia Franklin Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Hyram Franklin Patton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
The Estate of Gary Brannon v. City of Wetumpka et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Gary Brannon
Defendant:
City of Wetumpka, Bill Franklin and Michael V. Templin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Andy Franklin
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CV1 Mother et al v. Franklin et al
as 2:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
CV1 Mother and CV1
Defendant:
Rocky Shay Franklin, MG Freesites, Ltd. a foreign entity doing business as Pornhub, MG Freesites II, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Commercial Sex Acts Involving Minor Children (Sex Trafficking)
Baggett v. Mills et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Donald Franklin Baggett
Defendant:
Lorenzo Mills and Xavier Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Elmore County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Elmore County Jail, Mark K. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
