Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Macon v. Garner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Isiah Macon
Defendant:
Sergeant Garner, Medical Staff and YesCare Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Sidney Smith and April Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Inc. and Melanie Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Dana Berry, Emily Culver, Lisa Shehee and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Dean v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, Steven T. Marshall, The State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garner v. Russell County, Alabama et al
as 3:2016cv00567
Plaintiff:
Kwame Garner
Defendant:
Russell County, Alabama , City of Phenix City, Alabama , Raymond J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. City of Ozark, et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Spring Garner
Defendant:
City of Ozark and Phil Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Nathaniel Lawson, Gwendolyn Babers, S. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00795
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Garner v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00424
Plaintiff:
Sheila Garner
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
