Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Horton v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Horton, III
Defendant:
Shirley Cunningham, D. Boynes, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Horton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Steven T. Marshall and Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Hood et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2018cv00886
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Patricia Hood and Ray D. Martin
Plaintiff:
Zyrell Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Howard et al
as 3:2018cv00816
Defendant:
Crown Health Care Laundry Services, LLC, Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc., Roy Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Jim C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mims et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00437
Plaintiff:
Anthony Horton
Defendant:
Kunta Mims, L. Mills, Sgt. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rosevelt Horton
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steven Horton
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Rebecca Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edwin Horton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Olsen et al v. Alliance Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00654
Plaintiff:
Colene Olsen and Joseph LaRocca
Defendant:
Alliance Homes, Inc., American Camper Manufacturing, LLC, American Homestar Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
