Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Capotosto et al v. Pettis et al
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Capotosto and Donnie Capotosto
Defendant:
Brandon Michael Pettis and M&M Farms & Feed, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thomas v. Jo-Ann Fabrics, LLC
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Taylor Thomas
Defendant:
Jo-Ann Fabrics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jo v. Hwashin America Corporation et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jung Su Jo
Defendant:
Hwashin America Corporation and Se Won Kwon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Moss v. Chambers County Detention Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2016cv00944
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Moss
Defendant:
Chambers County Detention Facility, Melody Nutt, Nurse Jo Jo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Files, Jr.
Defendant:
Tallapoosa County Narcotics Task Force, Jimmy Abbett, E. Paul Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vines et al v. Cook et al (Joint Assign)
as 2:2014cv01183
Plaintiff:
Dana Jo Vines and Edward S. Vines
Defendant:
Billie Gene Cook and Richard Sisson Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maryland Casualty Company v. Fales et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv01122
Plaintiff:
Maryland Casualty Company
Defendant:
Robert Fales and M. Jo E. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
