Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Henderson v. Bowen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Billy Bowen, David Martinez, LifeTech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracy v. Dunn, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles William Bracy, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Cassandra Conway, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry Lightner, J. Caffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allums v. Holt (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Clarence Allums
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Golson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Theodore Sparks
Defendant:
Carolyn Golson and Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Shaddrick Vaughn
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kathy Holt and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brumfield v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
George A. Brumfield
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Kathy Holt, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00902
Plaintiff:
Carmice Reon Hill
Defendant:
Kim J. Thomas, Leon Forniss, Classification Tant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00890
Plaintiff:
Terrence Legerald Hollins
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffrey Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
