Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Palmer v. Lowe's Home Center, LLC (CONSENT)
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Palmer
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
The Brownstein Corporation v. Palmer
as 2:2020cv00378
Plaintiff:
The Brownstein Corporation
Defendant:
Jack B. Palmer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Fitzpatrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00393
Defendant:
T. Jones, Gallew David, D. Swift and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Woods (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Palmer
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer et al v. Naturmed, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2017cv00471
Plaintiff:
Chris Palmer and Beverly Crampton Palmer
Defendant:
NaturMed, Inc. , Institute for Vibrant Living and Bactolac Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
NaturMed, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Bactolac Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company v. Parsons et al
as 2:2016cv01009
Plaintiff:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brian Parsons, Parsons Farm Construction, LLC and Robert Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Palmer v. White (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Inez Palmer
Defendant:
South K. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
