Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Yocum v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Silas Wayne Yocum
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Ms. Yoh, Sgt. Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Joyce Adams, Randy Moore, Angela Price and others
Plaintiff:
Dale McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Sheppard (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00502
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rashad Martin
Defendant:
Ronnie T. Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Lawson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Lt. McCovery, John Pryor, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sirvoy Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bradford et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01091
Defendant:
Officer Lampkin, Captain Dansby, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond et al v. Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Donnie Strain, Jody McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Roberts Almond and Gregory Jack Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, et al (CONSENT)
as 3:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Dolly Britt
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company , J. Smith Lanier and Company, Inc. , Kathy Hyland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00854
Plaintiff:
Norma Sheppard
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wiggins v. Howard Sheppard, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00451
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wiggins
Defendant:
Howard Sheppard, Inc. and Jeremy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00461
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Sheppard
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
