Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Galarza et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Sanchez Galarza and Jose Ramiez Mendoza
Defendant:
Dwayne Allen Wilson and Milan Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rolle v. Cavazos et al
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sanchez Rolle
Defendant:
Jose Angel Salazar Cavazos and JBA Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Sanchez v. Cohen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Defendant:
Alan Cohen, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez v. Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Jeffery Keller, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
Maria Sanchez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00723
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Shepherd A. Odom, M.D., P.C., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Allen Griffith and Bessie Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00688
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Defendant:
Walter Woods and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Cotto-Sanchez v. Woods (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Angel Cotto-Sanchez
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
