Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Avery v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Carlton L. Avery
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Eller et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Stanley Wilson and Deputy Sheriff Eller
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. Pitts et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant:
Mike Cheshire, Clay Conway, Jonathan Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Tyrone Smith and Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Lowndes County Sheriff Office et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Office and Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Lowndes County Sheriff Office et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Office and Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Echenique v. Biden et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00534
Defendant:
Lamela Solomon, Julian Lennon, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Ivette T. Echenique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalrymple v. Coffee County, Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Dalrymple
Defendant:
Coffee County, Alabama, Coffee County Sheriff's Department and Scott Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
