Cases 1 - 10 of 22,104
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
v. Willis
as 2:2024cv00375
Defendant:
Cory Kenneth Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Henderson v. Amerson et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sean Henderson, Jr
Defendant:
Cody Amerson and Brady Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Acacia T. Jones
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Patrice Van Hill
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tanner v. Aldous & Associates, PLLC
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Robert Tanner
Defendant:
Aldous & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Askew v. Mckee et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Brian Denare Askew
Defendant:
Charles McKee and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
