Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Marable v. Insurance Surety Trust Bond et al
as 7:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Medical Mandatory Paroles Order of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles Act and Insurance Surety Trust Bond
Plaintiff:
Orrin Marable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Willingham et al
as 5:2020cv02022
Defendant:
Terry Anthony, Kim Willingham and Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole
Plaintiff:
Frederick D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Wendy Williams, Alabama, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Ana Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01977
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Pardons and Paroles, Steve Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2020cv01683
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Joey R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Julia Kim Williams, Tawana Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jerome Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Cooper et al
as 2:2020cv00482
Defendant:
James Smoot, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles State of, Gary Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Bernardro White and Bernardo White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ingle v. Anthony et al
as 2:2019cv01049
Defendant:
Spencer, State of Alabama Pardon and Parole Board and John Anthony
Plaintiff:
Wendy Crocker Ingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bulls v. Estes et al
as 5:2019cv00346
Respondent:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Warden Dewayne Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Reginald Bulls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
