Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Adderley v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv01431
Plaintiff:
Wilfred T. Adderley, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Elaine Duke, Transporation Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01381
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Michel v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al
as 7:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
Helene Michel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison FCI, A. Washington-Adduci, Ella Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuler et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2016cv00695
Plaintiff:
Shuler, Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Garrison, Cliff Sims, Alabama Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler et al v. Duke et al
as 2:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Liberty Duke, Christina Crow, Jinks Crow & Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ansur America v. Dukes Contracting Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01837
Plaintiff:
Ansur America
Defendant:
Dukes Contracting Inc and Jimmy Armstrong
Cross_claimant:
Dukes Contracting Inc
Cross_defendant:
Jimmy Armstrong
Counter_claimant:
Dukes Contracting Inc
Counter_defendant:
Ansur America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Dunn
as 2:2015cv01462
Petitioner:
Mark Duke
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
