Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Mims v. Ivey et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Fob James and United States Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mims v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2019cv02116
Plaintiff:
Scott Alan Mims
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mims v. Corizon, LLC (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 7:2019cv02065
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Cardaro Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Melton et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, John Hutton and Cordaro Melton
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00831
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Scott Mims, Mimsco Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Bowman and Lisa Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mims v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv08019
Plaintiff:
Ferlando Carmise Mims
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Continental Casulty Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 7:2017cv01082
Plaintiff:
Continental Casulty Company
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London , Joseph Mims and Company and Joe Mims Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mims v. Abernathy
as 7:2016cv01091
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Defendant:
Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
