Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rubin Lublin LLC v. Bryant et al
as 2:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Jon Michael Bryant, Jr, D R Jones, Allison B Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lublin LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Poole v. Devine et al
as 4:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Murrell Poole
Defendant:
R. Jones, Alex Burgess, John Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv01505
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Brown, Troy Hart and Landon Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Congress et al v. Morefield et al
as 2:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Ashley Congress and Unique Congress
Defendant:
James Morefield, Jr, Ronald R Jones and R&K Stoner Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Buckner et al
as 2:2012cv02749
Plaintiff:
Ahmad R Jones
Defendant:
Nancy T Buckner, C Johnson, Alicia J Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al
as 2:2011cv04089
Plaintiff:
Dan R Jones and Sheila M Bacon
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. 3M et al
as 5:2011cv03367
Plaintiff:
Venise Faye Jones , Joe L. Allen , William McDaniel and others
Defendant:
3M , Anchor Darling Valve Company, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Daniels et al
as 3:2010cv02138
Petitioner:
Henry R Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
L Daniels and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Carter et al
as 4:2010cv02079
Plaintiff:
Curtis Harris, Jr
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Carter, Sanders, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
