Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Perkins et al v. City of Decatur Alabama et al
as 5:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Catrela Perkins and A.P.
Defendant:
City of Decatur Alabama, Bailey Marquette, Christopher Mukkadam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Fox, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Craig Ray McGuire
Respondent:
Patrice Richie Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kister v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kister v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2021cv01018
Petitioner:
John Andrew Kister
Respondent:
Patrice Richie Jones and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00288
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC, Steven T Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morton v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Steven T Marshall, State of Alabama and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Dr Mark Twain Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Richie et al
as 1:2019cv01086
Respondent:
Patrice Richie and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Jonathan Virgil Davis and Jonathon Virgil Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fagan v. Richie (INMATE 3)
as 5:2019cv00939
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fagan
Defendant:
Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Underwood v. Richie et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and P Richie
Petitioner:
David Tinsley Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
