Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones, Jason Jones, Torin Robinson and others
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama and The Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JME Building And Development, LLC v v. The City of Fairhope, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JME Building And Development, LLC v
Defendant:
The City of Fairhope, Alabama, The City Council of The City of Fairhope, Alabama, Jimmy Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murey v. The City of Chickasaw Alabama et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fernando Reixac Murey
Defendant:
The City of Chickasaw Alabama , Michael E. Reynolds and C. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Brassel et al
as 2:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tempie Tyrell Robinson
Defendant:
Officer Brassel , Officer Powell , Officer McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. McAleer
as 1:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ray Robinson
Defendant:
John C. McAleer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Key v. Mott et al
as 1:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jonie Key
Defendant:
James Mott , The Town of Mount Vernon , Jerry C. Lundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kruse v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Frank H. Kruse
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. , Marcia Joiner , Marion Critz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. Klaetsch et al
as 1:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Gabriel Hawk
Defendant:
Sean Klaetsch , Trent Robinson , Charlotte Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. City of Bay Minette, Alabama et al
as 1:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
City of Bay Minette, Alabama, Jamie Tillery, Jonathan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
