Cases 11 - 20 of 22
BOKF, N.A. v. Bama Oaks Retirement, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Bama Oaks Retirement, LLC, Medical Clinic Board of the City of Mobile (second) and Saint Simons Heath Care, LLC
Plaintiff:
BOKF, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mingledorff's, Inc. v. Mason et al
as 1:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Toni S. Mason and Charlie Heath Mason
Plaintiff:
Mingledorff's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1730
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Mason et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Charlie Health Mason, Toni Scott Mason, Charlie Heath Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Hetrick et al
as 1:2019cv00856
Defendant:
C.O. Fagan, C.O. Howard, C. Daniel White and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson Supply Company v. 7 General Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jackson Supply Company
Defendant:
Toni S. Mason, 7 General Contracting, Inc., Heath Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hornady et al v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Takendric Stewart, William Heath Hornady and Christopher Miller
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Health v. Brothers Entertainment Group, LLC
as 2:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Heath
Defendant:
Brothers Entertainment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boothe v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 1:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Vincent Heath Boothe
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and JP Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
