Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Thomas Justin Bailey
Respondent:
Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lang et al v. Washington County, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Lang, Timothy Keith Williams, John Michael Taylor and others
Defendant:
Washington County, Alabama, Brad Johnston, William Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.F. of L-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan et al v. MI-DE-CON, Inc
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
A.F. of L-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, A.F. of L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Pension Plan, Allen Steadham and others
Defendant:
MI-DE-CON, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bailey v. McNeal et al
as 1:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
James Ray Bailey
Defendant:
Lt. McNeal and Unknown Female Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Town of Loxley, Huey Hoss Mack and Stephen Andrew Bailey
Plaintiff:
Delores Andrews and Sara A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Peters
as 1:2020cv00318
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fisher v. McCorquodale et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Alabama State Treasurer, Kay Ivey, Gaines G McCorquodale and others
Plaintiff:
Manson Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00771
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
David Ross Bailey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
