Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Harrison
Defendant:
Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiggins et al v. James Ward et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brandi Wiggins and Sameria Straughn
Defendant:
James Ward, Randy Brock and Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiggins v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Charles Cody Wiggins
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cieutat et al v. HPCSP Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00174
Plaintiff:
Nancy Dreher, Joshua Whites, Carol Reed and others
Defendant:
HPCSP Investments, LLC and Greg E. Lindberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wiggins v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00284
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowman et al v. American Fidelity Assurance Company
as 2:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bowman , Annie Eaton , Crystal Hanna and others
Defendant:
American Fidelity Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiggins v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
Keyanna C Wiggins
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Selma et al
as 2:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Green
Defendant:
City of Selma , State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
