Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cargill v. Raines et al
as 1:2016cv00493
Defendant:
I. Raines, Walter Myers and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Herman Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buford v. City Of Mobile et al
as 1:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
Lewis Bay Buford, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Mobile , Sherman E. Otis , Richard Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Sammy Howard
Defendant:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections, COI Rains, Gary Hetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Earl et al
as 1:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Christopher Earl, J. Raines, Larry Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raine v. USA
as 1:2013cv00147
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marco Shaunta Raine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Raine v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Raine, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Raine v. USA
as 1:2012cv00100
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marco Shaunta Raine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Riggins v. Culliver et al
as 1:2008cv00651
Plaintiff:
Darryl Riggins
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Sylvester Folks, David Craft and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raines v. First Health Life and Health, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00814
Plaintiff:
Douglas Raines and Douglas Raines
Defendant:
First Health Life and Health, Inc. and First Health Life and Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Raines v. First Health Life and Health, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00812
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raines and Joseph Raines
Defendant:
First Health Life and Health, Inc. and First Health Life and Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
