Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Conner v. McNeal et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Cooner and Daniel Dewayne Conner
Defendant:
Kendrick McNeal, Huey Hoss Mack, Dale Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braxton et al v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick and others
Defendant:
Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peoples v. City Of Selma et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Peoples
Defendant:
City Of Selma, Michael Granthum, Matthew Blaine Till and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
People's United Bank v. Teumer et al
as 1:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
People's United Bank
Defendant:
Lee Teumer and Victor Teumer
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al v. The Mobile Zoo et al
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Sallie Lane and Anna Ware
Defendant:
The Mobile Zoo and John Hightower
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Peoples v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tricia Peoples
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00067
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00065
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oden v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Ferrell Oden
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, The Peoples Bank of Greensboro, Michael Harrow Realty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
